What the methodology measures
The methodology looks at whether the setup stayed valid, whether the stop-loss framing behaved as expected, and whether the trader followed the process with discipline. That is more useful than reducing everything to a single number.
- Direction quality by setup
- Invalidation and stop-loss behaviour
- Execution discipline and review quality
What the methodology refuses to do
It does not flatten every instrument, timeframe, or market regime into one platform-wide percentage. That kind of number is easy to market and difficult to trust.
If the methodology cannot be explained setup by setup, it should not be trusted as a growth claim.
- No fake global win-rate claim
- No mixing of intraday and multiday behaviour into one bucket
- No removal of user discipline from the evaluation
Why a separate methodology page matters
Accuracy claims are easy to oversimplify. A dedicated methodology page makes it clearer how setups are reviewed, what is included in that review, and what is intentionally left out.
- Explains the review framework in one place
- Keeps the evaluation process transparent
- Links directly into paper validation and live examples
FAQ
Why create a separate trade-accuracy methodology page instead of only one validation page?
Because methodology and results are different things. This page explains the framework, while the validation page shows how that framework is applied.
Is this methodology page a performance statement?
No. It explains the evaluation framework, not a guaranteed result or a universal performance promise.
What should a reader open after reviewing the methodology?
Open the trade-accuracy validation page, the paper-trading examples page, and the public stock pages that show live market context.